Effective Sept 1, 2025, IRCC raises study-permit proof-of-funds for applications outside Quebec; single-applicant annual minimum is CAN$22,895 (excludes tuition and transportation). Scaled family amounts increased accordingly—policy aims to better reflect living costs but may raise financial barriers for lower-income students.
Soheil Hosseini
September 1, 2025
Jurisdiction
All Provinces
Week
Week 36
Impact
High
Programs Affected
IRCC Raises Minimum Settlement Funds for International Students; Single-Applicant Minimum Now $22,895 Effective Sept. 1, 2025
Summary: Effective 2025-09-01, IRCC has increased the minimum settlement funds international students must demonstrate for study permit applications across Canada (excluding Quebec), with a new single-applicant minimum of CAN$22,895, not including tuition or transportation. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has increased the minimum settlement funds required for international students applying for a Study Permit. The change applies to applications submitted on or after 2025-09-01 and covers all provinces and territories except Quebec. Source: IRCC. IRCC clarified that these amounts are calculated on a yearly basis and do not include tuition or transportation costs. Applicants must also demonstrate how they will finance the full duration of their studies. Key amounts required per year (excluding tuition and transportation; CAN$):
- 1 person (including the applicant): $22,895
- 2 people: $28,502
- 3 people: $35,040
- 4 people: $42,543
- 5 people: $48,252
- 6 people: $54,420
- 7 people: $60,589
- Each additional family member beyond 7: +$6,170 Applies to: Study Permit applicants filing on or after 2025-09-01 in all provinces and territories except Quebec (which maintains separate financial requirements).
Analysis: The higher settlement fund thresholds will likely have mixed effects. On the positive side, they may better align proof-of-funds with the actual cost of living, supporting student well-being and program integrity. However, the increases could raise financial barriers, potentially reducing access for lower-income applicants and affecting overall application volumes. Institutions and students may need to adjust financial planning, particularly where multi-year study costs and family accompaniment are involved.
Date of update: 2025-09-01
Tags: Canada immigration, IRCC, study permit, international students, proof of funds, settlement funds, cost of living, Quebec exception, policy update, 2025 changes End of article.
Categories
Share This Post
Stay Updated with Immigration News
Get the latest updates on Express Entry draws, OINP invitations, policy changes, and more delivered to your inbox.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.
Related Articles
Express Entry IME Required
IRCC now requires an upfront immigration medical exam (IME) with Express Entry permanent residence applications; policy took effect Aug 21, 2025. Applications received on or after Oct 21, 2025 without an IME may be rejected — applies to EE‑FSW, EE‑FST, EE‑CEC and EE‑PNP.
Startup Visa Backlog
A Sept. 15 article alleges Canada’s Startup Visa backlog now amounts to a 35‑year wait as admissions stay microscopic, leaving applicants delayed and work permits stalled. Critics say the SUV lacks guaranteed investment or job‑creation requirements and urge a federal entrepreneur program tying PR to capital‑at‑risk, measurable job creation, and tighter oversight of designated organizations.
Ford Reverses Work Permits
Ontario Premier Doug Ford reversed his plan to issue provincial work permits for asylum seekers, backing away from a challenge to federal jurisdiction while pressing Ottawa to clear processing backlogs. IRCC says asylum-seeker work permits are typically issued about 45 days after a complete application, but delays remain a concern for claimants and employers.
Ford Threatens Work Permits
Ontario Premier Doug Ford warned he may unilaterally issue work permits to asylum seekers—citing $1 billion/year housing costs and federal processing backlogs—to force faster action from Ottawa. Such a move would face federal legal constraints, risk employer/applicant confusion and deepen intergovernmental conflict even as it could pressure quicker permit processing.